Influence of dry and wet curing conditions on compressive strength of silica fume concrete


ATIS C. D. , OZCAN F., KILIC A., Karahan O. , BILIM C., SEVERCAN M.

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, cilt.40, ss.1678-1683, 2005 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi)

  • Cilt numarası: 40 Konu: 12
  • Basım Tarihi: 2005
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.12.005
  • Dergi Adı: BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
  • Sayfa Sayısı: ss.1678-1683

Özet

This paper reports a part of an ongoing laboratory investigation in which the compressive strength of silica fume concrete is studied under dry and wet curing conditions. In the study, a total of 48 concretes, including control Portland cement concrete and silica fume concrete, were produced with four different water-cement ratios (0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6), three different cement dosages (350, 400, 450kg/m(3)) and three partial silica fume replacement ratios (10%, 15%, 20%). A hyperplastisizer was used in concrete at various quantities to provide and keep a constant workability. Three cubic samples produced from fresh concrete were demoulded after a day; then, they were cured at 20 +/- 2 degrees C with 65% relative humidity (RH), and three other cubic samples were cured at 20 +/- 2 degrees C with 100% RH until the samples were used for compressive strength measurement at 28 days. The comparison was made on the basis of compressive strength between silica fume concrete and control Portland cement concrete. Silica fume concretes were also compared among themselves. The comparisons showed that compressive strength of silica fume concrete cured at 65% RH was influenced more than that of Portland cement concrete. It was found that the compressive strength of silica fume concrete cured at 65% RH was, at average, 13% lower than that of silica fume concrete cured at 100% RH. The increase in the water-cementitious material ratios makes the concrete more sensitive to dry curing conditions. The influence of dry curing conditions on silica fume concrete was marked as the replacement ratio of silica fume increased. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.