Comparison of the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec cell separators for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection

Altuntas F. , Kocyigit I. , Ozturk A. , Kaynar L. , Sari I., Oztekin M., ...Daha Fazla

TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, cilt.36, ss.159-167, 2007 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier

  • Cilt numarası: 36 Konu: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2007
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.transci.2006.10.008
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.159-167


Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are commonly used as a stein cell source for autologous transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate blood cell separators with respect to separation results and content of the harvest. Forty autologous PBPC collections in patients with hernatological malignancies were performed with either the Amicus or the COM.TEC cell separators. The median product volume was lower with the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC (125 mL vs. 300 mL; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median number of CD34+ cell/ kg in product between the Amicus and the COM.TEC (3.0 x 10(6) vs. 4.1 X 10(6); P = 0.129). There was a statistically higher mean volume of ACD used in collections on the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC (1040 241 mL vs. 868 + 176 mL; p = 0.019). There was a statistical difference in platelet (PLT) contamination of the products between the Amicus and the COM.TEC (0.3 x 10(11) vs. 1.1 x 10(11); p < 0.001). The median % decrease in PB PLT count was statistically higher in the COM.TEC compared to the Amicus instruments (18.5% vs. 9.50/0; p = 0.028). In conclusion, both instruments collected PBPCs efficiently. However, Amicus has the advantage of lower PLT contamination in the product, and less decrease in PB platelet count with lower product volume in autologous setting. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.