Effects of a new desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets


Creative Commons License

YAĞCI A. , Uysal T., AKINCI H., UYSAL B.

KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, cilt.41, ss.121-126, 2011 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier

  • Cilt numarası: 41 Konu: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2011
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4041/kjod.2011.41.2.121
  • Dergi Adı: KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.121-126

Özet

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) and failure site location of brackets bonded to enamel with or without desensitizer application. Methods: Sixty-six freshly extracted human premolar teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 22. Group 1 served as the control. Desensitizer was applied to the remaining teeth at two time intervals (Group 2, bonded immediately after Pro-Relief (TM) (Colgate-Palmolive Co., New York, NY, USA) application and Group 3, bonded 30 days after Pro-Relief (TM) application with the teeth stored in artificial saliva during the 30 days). Orthodontic brackets were banded with a light cure composite resin and cured with a halogen light. After bonding, the SBS of the brackets was tested using a universal testing device. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were determined after the brackets failed. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, Tukey's HSD, and G tests. Results: The SBS was significantly lower in Group 2 than in Groups 1 (p = 0.024) and 3 (p = 0.017). Groups 1 and Group 3 did not differ (p = 0.991). ARI scores did not differ significantly among groups. Conclusions: The Pro-Relief (TM) desensitizer agent applied immediately before bonding significantly reduces bond strength, but the SBS values still exceed the minimum 5.9 - 7.8 MPa required for adequate clinical performance. Immersing the teeth in artificial saliva for 30 days after applying the Pro-Relief (TM) desensitizer agent and before bonding increased the SBS to control levels. (Korean J Orttiod 2011;41(2):121-126)