Biological therapy management from the initial selection of biologics to switching between biologics in severe asthma


Creative Commons License

YILMAZ İ., ÇETİN G. P., ARSLAN B., ŞEKER S., YILMAZ H. E. B., AKTAŞ E., ...Daha Fazla

Tüberküloz ve Toraks, cilt.71, sa.1, ss.75-93, 2023 (ESCI) identifier identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Derleme
  • Cilt numarası: 71 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5578/tt.20239910
  • Dergi Adı: Tüberküloz ve Toraks
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, MEDLINE, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.75-93
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Severe asthma, biologics, mepolizumab, omalizumab, dupilu-mab, reslizumab, benralizumab
  • Erciyes Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of this review is to elaborate the management of biologic therapy from initial selection to switching biologics in severe asthma. A nonsystematic review was performed for biological therapy management in severe asthma. Depending on clinical characteristics and biomarkers, selecting the preferred biologic based on super-responder criteria from previous studies may result in adequate clinical efficacy in most patients. On the other hand, no matter how carefully the choice is made, in some patients, it may be necessary to discon- tinue the drug due to suboptimal clinical response or even no response. This may result in the need to switch to a different biological therapy. How long the biological treatment of patients whose asthma is controlled with biologics will be continued and according to which criteria they will be terminated remains unclear. It has been shown that in patients with a long history of good response to biologics, asthma control may be impaired when biologics are discontinued, while it may persist in others. Therefore, discontinuation of biologics may be a viable strategy in a particular patient group. Clinicians should make the best use of all predictive factors to identify patients who will most benefit from each biologic. Patients who do not meet a predefined res- ponse criterion after sufficient time for response evaluation and who are eli- gible for one or more alternative biological agents should be offered the opportunity to switch to another biologic. There is no consensus on when the biologics used in severe asthma that produce favorable results should be dis- continued. In our opinion, treatment should continue for at least five years, as premature termination may potentially deteriorate asthma control.