Nano clay mitigation of wind induced soil loss across aggregate sizes through wind tunnel experiments and explainable machine learning


Creative Commons License

Wehliye A. A., KAPLAN S.

Scientific Reports, cilt.16, sa.1, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 16 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1038/s41598-026-73412-y
  • Dergi Adı: Scientific Reports
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, Chemical Abstracts Core, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Zoological Record, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Aggregate size, Machine learning, Nano-clay, Wind erosion, Wind speed
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Erciyes Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This study aimed to investigate, under wind-tunnel conditions, the effects of different nano-clay application rates (0, 0.94, 1.88, and 3.75 g m⁻²) on wind-induced soil loss across different aggregate sizes (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm) and wind speeds (8, 10, and 12 m s⁻¹). In addition, the study aimed to model wind-induced soil loss processes using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence methods. The wind-tunnel experiments revealed that nano-clay applications significantly reduced soil loss across all aggregate sizes and wind-speed conditions. The highest protective effect was obtained at the 3.75 g m⁻² nano-clay rate; soil loss decreased by 80.8% in the 2 mm aggregates, by 93.2% in the 1 mm aggregates, and by 95.9% in the 0.5 mm aggregates. The protective effect of the nano-clay applications was found to be particularly pronounced at high wind speeds and in fine aggregates. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost showed the strongest development-stage performance under repeated nested group-aware cross-validation (R² = 0.835 ± 0.064, RMSE = 11.896 ± 2.229, MAE = 6.686 ± 0.854) and was selected before independent holdout evaluation. On the group-held-out test set, the selected XGBoost model achieved R² = 0.882, RMSE = 13.298, and MAE = 9.443. The lower performance of the linear baseline suggested that the tree-based models captured predictive structure not adequately represented by a simple linear formulation. SHAP analysis indicated that nano-clay dose made the largest mean absolute contribution to the fitted model predictions, followed by wind speed and aggregate size. Overall, nano-clay substantially reduced wind-induced soil loss within the controlled experimental conditions examined here; broader practical applicability requires validation under field conditions.