Artificial Intelligence-Supported Decision Support in Institutional Foodservice: A Plan-Produce-Monitor-Improve Framework


Çapaş M., Çavdar M.

14. Uluslararası ACHARAKA Tıp, Hemşirelik, Ebelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Kongresi, Baku, Azerbaycan, 16 - 18 Temmuz 2026, ss.655-660, (Tam Metin Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Tam Metin Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Baku
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Azerbaycan
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.655-660
  • Erciyes Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Institutional foodservice systems are expected to provide nutritionally adequate, acceptable, feasible and safe meals while also controlling production volume and reducing avoidable food waste. In practice, decisions about menu design, purchasing, preparation, portioning, consumption and leftovers are often handled as separate steps. This separation limits the use of real consumption data in future menu planning and may weaken the connection between nutritional quality and operational sustainability.

This paper proposes a conceptual framework for positioning artificial intelligence-supported applications as decision-support tools in institutional foodservice. The framework is organized around a four-stage cycle: plan, produce, monitor and improve. It connects menu planning and optimization, AI-supported meal planning, image-based food recognition, portion or volume estimation, multimodal nutrient-intake estimation, demand-related production planning, plate-waste monitoring, food-intake assessment. The aim is not to present these technologies as independent innovations, but to show how they may contribute to a continuous foodservice decision process.

In the planning stage, AI-supported tools may assist the comparison of alternative menus according to nutritional composition, menu feasibility, cost-related constraints, consumer acceptability and environmental considerations. These tools do not replace professionals' decision; rather, they can make trade-offs more visible when several goals need to be considered at the same time. In the production stage, previous service records and demand-related variables may support more accurate preparation decisions and help reduce overproduction. In the monitoring stage, image-based recognition, portion or volume estimation and multimodal assessment approaches may provide more objective information on actual food intake, liquid leftovers and plate waste than routine visual observation or retrospective records alone.

The improvement stage is the point at which the framework becomes a decision-support cycle rather than a collection of digital tools. Data obtained after service can be used to revise menus, standardize portions, improve staff training, strengthen simulation-based learning and identify workflow points where automation may support consistency. In cafeterias and other institutional settings, it may support food-waste reduction by showing where avoidable waste occurs and which menu or service characteristics require revision.

The proposed framework places the dietitian at the center of interpretation and implementation. Artificial intelligence should be considered an auxiliary infrastructure that organizes data and supports decisions, not an autonomous authority in menu planning or nutrition care. Safe implementation requires local food and menu datasets, validation under real service conditions, attention to portion diversity, data privacy, institutional feasibility and compatibility with existing foodservice workflows. The framework also underlines that different institutional settings require different levels of evidence: a hospital meal tray, a school lunch menu and a university cafeteria service cannot be evaluated with the same operational assumptions. Within these conditions, AI-supported systems may help institutional foodservice move from fragmented decision-making toward a continuous plan-produce-monitor-improve model that links nutritional adequacy with operational efficiency and waste reduction.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; institutional foodservice; menu planning; intake monitoring; food waste; conceptual framework