Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, cilt.14, sa.52, ss.509-530, 2019 (Hakemli Dergi)
Getiri oranları, finansal karar verme sürecinin en önemli karşılaştırma ve karar verme araçlarından
birisidir. Bu nedenle, küçük veya büyük her türlü yatırım kararının verilmesinde veya alternatif
yatırım seçeneklerinin değerlendirilmesinde getiri oranının hesaplanması gerekir. Bireysel Emeklilik
Sistemi (BES) bağlamında yapılan ödemeler de diğer yatırım tercihlerinden çok da farklılık arz etmez.
Bu nedenle BES yatırımlarının da getiri oranlarının çeşitli bakış açılarına göre hesaplanabilmesi gerekir.
Katılımcıların her an BES yatırımlarının getiri oranını hesaplayabilmesine yönelik önemli bir ihtiyaç
olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bunun iki gerekçesi vardır. Birincisi; ilgili literatürde bu ihtiyacın karşılanmasına
yönelik bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. İkincisi; Türkiye örneğinde, BES sistemine yatırım
yapan ve/veya yatırım yapma potansiyeli olan milyonlarca bireysel katılımcı vardır. Bu nedenle, çalışmanın
amacı; herhangi bir BES yatırım senaryosunun getiri oranını (efektif faiz oranı) çeşitli bakış açıları
çerçevesinde nasıl hesaplanıp değerlendirilebileceğine ilişkin örnek vaka analizi tasarlamak ve çözüm
önerileri sunmaktır. Bu amaçla, çalışmada, bir BES yatırımının çeşitli varsayımlar çerçevesinde
getiri analizinin nasıl yapılabileceğine ilişkin üç farklı yaklaşım sunulmuştur. Ayrıca çalışmada, BES
yatırımı getiri oranının artırılmasında etkili olan faktör ve hareket tarzlarının değerlendirilmesi konusunda
katılımcılara bazı önerilerde bulunulmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Bireysel Emeklilik Sistemi (BES), Efektif Faiz Oranı, Getiri Oranı.
JEL Kodları: G00, G11, G22.
Individual Pension System (IPS) can be defined as a type
of private pension system designed to ensure that individuals earn additional
income by which they can maintain their living standards in the future.
Individual pension system allows individuals to invest their savings in pension
plans usually managed by asset management companies in this area. Contribution
payments made by investors in the IPS can be assessed similar to other
financial investments. The objective of the study is to guide how the rate of
return (effective interest rate) on an IPS investment can be calculated. In
this regard, three different approaches, on the issue of how the return
analysis of any IPS investment can be done under various assumptions, are
presented in the study. No similar study aiming to calculate the rate of return
on any IPS investment has been found in the related literature. In the related
literature, the generally accepted approach seems to be the analysis of the
effectiveness of insurance companies and of the funds they manage. There are
many such studies in the related literature like Peker 2016, Kizilgeçit 2014, Karakaya, Kurtaran and Dağlı 2014, Alptekin and
Şıklar 2009. It is unlikely that the analyses used in such studies referred
above can be used to calculate the rate of return of any IPS investment.
Because in an IPS investment; there are millions of unique investment scenarios
specific to each IPS investment in terms of the timing of the funds channeled
to the system, amount of contribution payments, the percentage of funds in the
pension plan, and the disparity of participant-specific funding expenditure
cutoffs. For this reason, the approach presented in this study is expected to
provide a good example of how the rate of return of any IPS portfolio, which is
initiated and developed specifically for each IPS participant, can be
calculated at any given time. Therefore, the most important contribution of the
study to the related literature is that it designs the return analysis from the
viewpoint of the IPS participants. A case analysis on an IPS investor in Turkey
was conducted in the study to illustrate how to calculate and interpret the
rate of return (effective interest rate) on his/her IPS investment under
various assumptions at a given time. The calculation approach presented in the
study can be used by the sector experts for the purpose of informing, directing
and encouraging their IPS participants. This study focuses on the resolution of
a case study, developed by using a real individual IPS participant's data. In
this context, three different analyses were carried out, with three different
assumptions, in calculating the rate of return on the IPS investment: In the
subsection titled Realistic Analysis (Assumption 1), the case was analyzed on
11.04.2018 through a real IPS investment scenario. Accordingly, the
participant's annual rate of return was calculated as 15,1062%. For the same
case, the average annual inflation rate (consumer price index-CPI) for the
corresponding investment period is 8,5785%. Hence the real rate of return for
the case was calculated as 6,0119%. Fund performance analysis (Assumption 2) is
designed to assess the performance of the insurance company responsible for
fund management, particularly from the perspective of IPS participants. Within
the framework of the assumptions set for this analysis, the annual rate of
return on the date of the analysis is 16.1610%. The annual real rate of return
was calculated as 6,9834% taking into account the annual average inflation rate
for the investment period. The optimistic analysis (Assumption 3) is designed
on the assumption that the IPS participant has obtained the pension on the date
of the analysis. As a result of the analysis carried out within the framework
of this last assumption, the annual rate of return was calculated as 17,1204%.
The real rate of return was calculated as 7,8670%. Within this framework, two
types of suggestions can be made to increase the rate of return on any IPS
investment: Firstly, the most important potential contributor to the high
return on the IPS investment is the performance of the funds comprising the
pension plan. Secondly, there may be some actions that will maximize the
positive impact of the state contribution on the rate of return. Accordingly,
it is expected that the positive impact of the state contribution to the rate
of return on IPS investment will reach to the highest level on the dates when
the participant is entitled to the upper level through which he/she will be
allowed to receive a higher percentage of the accumulated state contribution in
the pension plan.
Keywords: Individual Pension System (IPS), Effective Interest Rate, Rate of
Return, Case Study.
JEL Classification: G00, G11, G22.