Maximizing Dry Bean Yield with Plastic-Covered Ridge and Furroe Rainwater Harvesting and Its Evapotranspiration Comparisons

Creative Commons License

Ünlükara A., Arı Gökkaya Z.

JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, cilt.152, sa.1, ss.1-11, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 152 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1061/jidedh.ireng-10610
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Applied Science & Technology Source, Scopus, Aerospace Database, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Academic Search Premier, Aqualine, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), Communication Abstracts, Compendex, Computer & Applied Sciences, Environment Index, Geobase, INSPEC, CAB Abstracts, Metadex, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, DIALNET, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-11
  • Erciyes Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems, particularly plastic-covered ridges and furrow RWH techniques, have gained significant

importance in recent years due to the need to address frequent drought events, mitigate the effects of climate change, and ensure food security

for the growing global population. This study aimed to determine the yield and growth response of dry beans, which are essential for human

nutrition and food security, to RWH. Additionally, four approaches Eqs. (1)–(5) from the literature, along with a new method, were compared

for crop evapotranspiration (ET) under RWH in rain-fed farming areas in Türkiye. All ET equations are derived from the soil moisture budget

method (SMBM). Eq. (1) represents the conventional SMBM, Eq. (2) the SMBM for the furrow area, Eq. (3) the SMBM for RWH, Eq. (4) the

SMBM for RWH with a runoff estimator, and Eq. (5) the SMBM for the simplified RWH approach. RWH treatments consisted of three-row

distances (50, 75, and 120 cm), compared to conventional rain-fed farming (CRF) practices. All plant growth and yield parameters were

significantly enhanced under RWH. The overall seed yield for CRF was 103 and 348 kg=ha in 2020 and 2021, while for RWH, it was 484 and

1,594 kg=ha, respectively. Compared to CRF, RWH increased seed yield by 370% and 377%, respectively, while water use efficiency improved

by 392% and 395%, respectively. Significant differences in ET results were found for the five approaches. For Eq1, Eq2, Eq3, Eq4, and

Eq5, the overall ET values were 134.8, 251.9, 139.0, 124.5, and 131.0 mm, respectively. Except for Eq2, all methods can be used for RWH,

but the Eq. (5) allows for a simple estimate. The RWH method, with 45-cm-covered ridges and 30-cm furrows, is recommended for dry beans

in the semiarid regions of Türkiye.