yılmaz, u. Et Al. 2000. Does plurodesis for plural effusions give bright ideas about the agents for hydrocele sclerotherapy?. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY , vol.32 , 89-92.

yılmaz, u., EKMEKÇİOĞLU, O., TATLIŞEN, A., & DEMİRCİ, D., (2000). Does plurodesis for plural effusions give bright ideas about the agents for hydrocele sclerotherapy?. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY , vol.32, 89-92.

yılmaz, Uğur Et Al. "Does plurodesis for plural effusions give bright ideas about the agents for hydrocele sclerotherapy?," INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY , vol.32, 89-92, 2000

yılmaz, Uğur Et Al. "Does plurodesis for plural effusions give bright ideas about the agents for hydrocele sclerotherapy?." INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY , vol.32, pp.89-92, 2000

yılmaz, u. Et Al. (2000) . "Does plurodesis for plural effusions give bright ideas about the agents for hydrocele sclerotherapy?." INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY , vol.32, pp.89-92.

@article{article, author={Uğur YILMAZ Et Al. }, title={Does plurodesis for plural effusions give bright ideas about the agents for hydrocele sclerotherapy?}, journal={INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY}, year=2000, pages={89-92} }